34,837 results · Most relevant
Given a perfect rating system, you would take the entrepreneur over the idea every time; the idea serves as a lens to evaluate the entrepreneur — their life path to it, its quality, and how much original work they did.
LLM-generated queries are untrusted and could contain dangerous operations or cross tenant boundaries, so they must be validated for correctness and safety. Validation is the most important step in the natural-language-to-query pipeline. Queries can contain really dangerous operators, like the $function operator, which would execute raw JavaScript on the DB server.
endorsed
When metadata fields contain tenant IDs and each query should be isolated to a specific tenant, inject those fields underneath the scenes rather than letting the LLM interact with them. Allowing the LLM to interact with such metadata fields risks breaking tenant isolation, and hidden fields the LLM shouldn't access should be constrained from being derived or executed on.
When the validation engine rejects a query, the system loops the error back into the LLM and has it self-correct through a retry loop with a macro. The LLM may take a couple attempts but eventually converges on a valid query.
Do not drop where the data is coming from; always store it. Store data provenance in metadata associated with the data in vector DBs. Traceability is critical for business-critical decisions made on versioned or potentially outdated data. Record where data was fetched from and when, under what ID and what scopes it was accessed, who accessed it and what permissions were used, and whether it was transformed and what it originally looked like. Every answer has to be traceable; otherwise you may be left not knowing why your AI made a bad decision.
Dr. Elissa Epel notes that chronically stressful situations going on for years are common — many people have them in their lives. For chronic stressors you cannot change (like caregiving, other people, certain relationships), she recommends acceptance and radical acceptance strategies to live well with them. Radical acceptance is a critical strategy for people who feel their life will be stressful forever: it lets you deal with uncontrollable chronic stress without it taking a toll on your body. The alternative — chronic rumination on unchangeable stressors, chronically problem-solving and wishing things were different — keeps the stress alive.
An athlete with strong jumps but weak acceleration will very likely not improve acceleration by jumping higher. The missing pieces are orienting the push horizontally over several steps, so address acceleration weakness specifically rather than with more jump training.
Trunk collapse during acceleration — where the trunk keeps bending forward at foot contact instead of staying fixed — behaves like a passive trailer and slows the athlete down. This is invisible in the numbers but visible in high-speed video, so slow-motion video is required to locate the weak point. Film athletes during acceleration in addition to measuring them.
When an agent invocation cracks a previously unsolved task, immediately distill that run into a reusable skill and distribute it to all future runs, so one success raises success rates everywhere.
As you build and sell AI at scale, four patterns keep repeating that are very similar to banking systems. Pattern 1: reserve before inference and settle actuals after — increasingly common, with ramifications for accounting and concurrent workloads. Pattern 2: AI companies increasingly prefer keeping usage events data inside their VPC for latency, cost, and data sovereignty reasons. Pattern 3: for agentic workloads, since you don't know in advance what an agent will do or cost, check balances as the agent works, reserve and account in advance, then asynchronously reconcile after the fact.
Patterns described from the speaker's experience
Liemandt recommends reminding learners right before they are going to forget material; done a few times, recall moves to long-term memory and is there when needed. Alpha School's learning scientists found, based on published papers, that you don't need initial mastery — you can reach mastery with spaced repetition alone — though this is too fine-grained to measure in a school setting.
Use redundancy in database infrastructure: a primary node handling most traffic with replica/follower servers standing by in different data centers or availability zones. This costs more money and is more complex, but it is the way to scale databases reliably. Redundancy is easier for stateless workloads (Cloudflare Workers, Vercel functions, AWS Lambda) that auto-scale, but databases must store state reliably and cannot lose a single byte, making redundancy harder.
A single-node database works fine at ~10 GB but not at 10 TB, 100 TB, or a petabyte. Use sharding to spread data and queries across many servers, and put a proxy (e.g., VTgate) between the application and shards to intelligently distribute requests. Do not use sharding by itself: within each shard run a redundant primary-plus-replica system so the shard can self-heal. The same spreading principle applies to many other areas of the stack.
Avoid combining all services (Postgres OLTP, analytics, queuing, job system, caching) into one system, even though it is convenient. It adds complexity, breaks failure isolation (if one service goes down, everything goes down), and creates resource contention — e.g., a burst of queue jobs forces scaling queues when nothing else needs to. Keep services decoupled so each component can be scaled independently.
Design infrastructure so a single component failure does not take down the whole system: isolate the data plane (databases and critical data) from control planes, observability pipelines, analytics frameworks, apps, and MCPs. Components deployed more frequently are more likely to fail, so ensure a bad control-plane deploy cannot impact access to the data plane or database.
Popular databases like MySQL, Postgres, and SQLite handle overload poorly — too many queries, too much CPU, or exhausted RAM cache can crash them, taking down the server and impacting all users. Implement backpressure: when resource thresholds are exceeded, fail requests, deny queries, and deny connections so existing users or some traffic stay healthy while other traffic degrades gracefully. The rest of the stack must be built to support this. Backpressure applies across the stack but is arguably most important in the database.
Varun states evals are the starting point and ending point for any agent architecture, and that the way they think about evals is in five different levels. He names several: trace the path (how did the AI come up with this solution?), score the AI like an engineer based on its path compared against how the best engineer would perform the investigation, and calibrate the AI's confidence level. He advises building all evals systematically into one platform and constantly pushing the architecture against them whenever there's a new model, new use case, or architecture change.
Varun describes pillar 3 as causal reasoning: the root cause must always be based on a causal chain of evidence capturing the exact, precise steps that happened that led to the issue. If the chain of evidence cannot be established, give out the information with a low confidence level and point the user in a different direction. He says this principle is true for any domain-specific AI, not just Resolve AI.
Varun describes pillar 2 as context engineering. He discourages minimizing it to the database or execution solution — graph RAG, knowledge graph, etc. — calling those implementation details. The goal is determining the precise amount of context AI needs to solve the specific problem, and it is most often a combination of techniques rather than a single solution. He also advises defining very precise tool calls (log queries, metrics, dashboards, code queries) so you don't burn through tokens quickly when making multiple tool calls.
Marc Klingen describes the pattern Langfuse's best users follow when building agents: collect production signals, track them alongside detailed execution traces, and then run agents on a loop — usually a cron job every day or every week, whenever there's a batch of interesting user data — to act on it.
Use saved training trajectories and a controlled intervention to explain a failure, separating equilibrium theory from observed empirical stability.
Demonstrate all 3 repaired bugs and defend why a passed gradient check is necessary but not sufficient for generalization.
Use the tractable fixture and posterior predictive results to separate approximation, sampling and model errors; justify one revised modeling assumption.
Choose sources → to get a library of your own and a daily brief.
Map each implemented component to the original paper and explain 2 reduced-model failure modes without claiming full-scale reproduction.
Use calibration and shift measurements to justify a monitoring or abstention threshold, and give an explicit confounding counterexample to causal feature-attribution claims.
Defend a causal claim or refusal using the DAG, numerical estimates and a counterexample showing why predictive model fit cannot establish identification.
