35,800 results · Most relevant
In the study, winter swimmers had increased insulin sensitivity compared to a matched control group, produced less insulin on all experimental days, and had faster glucose clearance from the bloodstream — after two hours their glucose curve went down faster than the control group.
A 2017 study by Hansen et al. measured brown fat via PET-CT scanning at baseline, then after subjects slept at 19 degrees Celsius for one month, then at 24 degrees, then at 27 degrees. Sleeping at 19 degrees for just one month — under a duvet with clothes on — produced a remarkable increase in brown fat. When subjects slept at 24 degrees the next month, their brown fat activation and insulin sensitivity decreased slightly, and at 27 degrees for the fourth month they saw even less brown fat activation and lower insulin sensitivity.
hedged
Søberg endorses the idea that cold water immersion is meant to be hard: if the water is very cold and you feel very cold, you should stay in a little longer, and if you enjoy it, something is wrong. The discomfort is the point of the practice.
Activation of brown fat or muscles increases metabolism, which improves insulin sensitivity, and this is shown in studies. Better insulin sensitivity can prevent lifestyle diseases and lower blood pressure, which is a strong marker of how much inflammation is in the body. Activating brown fat keeps metabolism higher and improves insulin sensitivity.
The Soberg principle: end on cold so the body is forced to heat itself back up, which keeps brown fat and muscles activated and increases metabolism further. Ending on cold acts like an exercise for the body that continues for hours afterwards, affecting metabolism and keeping neurotransmitters activated because the body is still cold. Keeping the body cold after immersion requires neurotransmitters to activate brown fat, which makes brown fat cells and muscle cells more efficient and increases mitochondria that generate heat fast.
The speaker endorses the principle that one score is not the system — the idea is to build a holistic evaluation system. He notes that in 2022 and 2023 you were measuring models for coding or writing ability, but today agentic persistent systems have to do multiple things, so you must design a holistic evaluation system at all points in time.
The speaker endorses the principle that you have to turn real world failures into future tests, noting this has been true in software throughout history.
Concluding, the speaker endorses testing the job and not just the answer as extremely key to the whole process, and restates that the first step is always to define your most ambitious success — think about what life would be in AGI, a model with no inabilities that performs like the human you're trying to emulate, and define in that process.
Bakken explains that running above threshold starts producing many more negative effects than running right below the threshold, which is one of the points of this method.
Bakken observes that the trouble for most runners, even at the top level, is running a little bit too hard on easy days, and the accumulated trouble that builds over time from that.
The Norwegian threshold method is threshold training for long-term perspective and durability — balancing the body week after week. With the balanced approach, a surprising side effect is increased performance: you get both better health and faster running, contrary to the assumption that going hard every week yields the most benefit. Going hard every week does not produce the most benefit. The method is productive for long-term health even for people with cardiovascular disease taking statins or blood pressure medication, as long as they build a base, monitor heart rate, and ease into it.
Consequential creator advice requires independent verification before Today can promote it.
Commercial context: The creator presents this as their own offering and directs viewers to get it.
Dr. Marius Bakken argues that the trouble for most athletes and runners, even at the top level, is running a little bit too hard on easy days — the accumulated trouble over time. Doing too hard on easy days leads to trouble either way, while doing too little on threshold days means not getting enough volume; you need to do easy on the easy runs so one session does not accumulate into the next.
Marius Bakken explains that in a threshold session muscle tone will increase, while an easy training day after a hard session brings it back down again. Across the training week, the aim is to not accumulate tone: go up on the hard days and down on the easy days. An easy run lowers muscle tone during the run, which is one of the reasons to have easy runs.
Dr. Marius Bakken presents having control over the recovery window as a central principle of training. More intense running has unpredictable recovery windows — sometimes one day, sometimes three — making it hard to control, whereas with threshold work one easy day is usually sufficient, giving you control over recovery.
Commercial context: The creator describes this as their own product.
Bakken's philosophy is building each week for a very long period of time, and getting better and better by doing it that way.
Bakken argues that if you can do more total interval work than continuous work over the week, intervals are likely more beneficial than continuous running. He frames this as a load-comparison heuristic rather than a universal rule.
Bakken argues that balancing training load week after week improves both health and performance — the performance increase is a side effect of the balance approach — and that going hard every week does not produce the most benefit, contrary to intuition.
The host endorses that training improvement comes down not just to how hard you train but to the overarching structure and framework: how threshold days are done, how low-intensity cardio is pieced in, and how X workouts fit into the week.
Bakken describes that doing too much anaerobic work has negative effects on the muscular system, on the load, on the unpredictability of recovery, and seems to shift what the body prioritizes in competition.
Bakken endorses that the Norwegian method aims to get a lot of training effect without the risk by controlling risk factors along the way.
Choose sources → to get a library of your own and a daily brief.