35,595 results · Most relevant
In Parameter Golf, Aiden automated the full research loop: it pulls public papers from arXiv, strong implementations from GitHub, and its own past logs, then proposes new ideas, tests them, audits them for legality, keeps the ones that work, writes the implementation, and runs the experiments. Once results clear quality gates, Aiden creates and submits a PR for review.
If a system has zero cost for exploration (e.g., not a bank), put agents in the environment, let them try different things, and map all of the trajectories — it's actually a simpler problem to solve than the general computer-use problem. If it's a bank (or similar), there is a cost for exploration, so you cannot explore all of the actions.
endorsed heuristic
The neural symbolic experiment works by letting the VLM agent run in the environment while it keeps writing code to a file. Once a workflow is successful, you have successful code; the next time you run the agent, you can run the code first instead of the VLM agent. If the environment changes and the code breaks, there is a healing loop with the coding agent. Ang Li notes this healing loop is an initial effort that works in a lot of cases but sometimes still has hiccups.
Signal is an out-of-the-box agent that lives on the Arize platform in a sandbox, turned on with one toggle in project settings. It continuously runs on production traces in the background, reading every trace coming in, clusters failures by root cause, and dedupes failures across runs. Because it is an agent with a full harness, it can call external tools — you can connect it to your GitHub repo and downstream data sources like Datadog. Sitting on top of trace data as the source of truth, Signal self-reflects, looks at the code for the running agent, checks downstream data sources, writes an investigation with severity and evidence, and opens a PR.
Arize skills let your own coding agent (Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and 40+ others) query traces from Arize directly. With the skills, you can ask your coding agent (e.g., Claude Code) to read your traces from within the repo, so it sees both what the agent is doing from trace data and the actual agent code at the same time to make impactful fixes. Arize offers skills for creating datasets off of failures, reading traces and doing trace error analysis, and running evaluators and tasks on the platform. In the skills workflow, Claude Code can write the fix itself because it sits in your coding repo; Signal can also push a PR because it has access to your GitHub repo.
Giving the agent the code (e.g., a dbt or Airflow project) fails because it re-derives context from scratch on every prompt — probabilistic and bounded by the context window — and every new session requires rebuilding context. Giving it database access (e.g., a Snowflake or Databricks MCP) fails because it can see and sample rows but has no understanding of what each row means. Neither has a persistent model of how the system actually behaves.
For impact analysis, before an agent writes a line of SQL to modify a model's grain, it walks downstream in the graph and asks each downstream dependency node whether the change breaks it. Example: changing grain from monthly to weekly would cause a monthly ARR measure to get repeated across weekly rows, and downstream ARR summing monthly values would show roughly a 4X of the actual accurate value. A grain change can propagate downstream to a board-level dashboard because the context graph is inclusive of the entire data system, from source systems down to the BI and dashboards layer. The agent has visibility and is able to walk the lineage all the way across the data lifecycle. Impact analysis happens pre-flight — not at build time and not in a production incident; the agent knows the bl
hypothetical example
In the join recommendation use case, when an agent wants to attribute ARR by marketing channel, it doesn't pick a path based on column names; it checks whether each join key is actually unique — verified against the data by profiling the actual tables themselves. The agent recommends the actual safe join path while flagging joins that would cause a fan out, a 7X in rows, or silently drop 12% of rows downstream. Recommendations come with actual reasoning and evidence, grounded in the data itself.
The host warns that if you pull an API key in from your password vault and send it as part of the agent, it can get exfiltrated through the agent on a tool call to whatever web server is being hosted by a bad actor.
In a regular agent flow (e.g., OpenClaw), a user request is sent to an agent runtime, which may fetch a needed secret from a vault like 1Password or HashiCorp Vault; the secret is then sent to the LLM reasoning layer, which makes an API request through a tool call and returns the answer to the user. Because secrets get fed directly to the LLM, they may get used in training data — an anti-pattern.
hypothetical example
Omar explains that in Reducto's document extraction use case the platform first parses the document; you can stick any document into Reducto, click run, configure bells and whistles, and see real-time results. Before scaling to a million documents, he used the Reducto canvas to verify extraction accuracy matched expectations.
On the WolfBench leaderboard, the star mark is the ceiling — the percentage of the benchmark the model has solved at least once across runs. A wide best-to-worst spread (e.g. 79% to 60%) means a lot of randomness, and you can't really trust the model to execute the test even with a high score.
The speaker describes offloading specific tasks that need to be done on virtual private clouds to a dedicated edge/cluster and continuing work without disruption.
The speaker recommends preprocessing sensitive documents with open-source OCR models and returning the result to the main agent's harness, which yields both lower token spend and better context quality.
The speaker recommends using an MCP server rather than a simple plugin or API when a dedicated cluster backbone is needed for scaling features and model routing, as it better separates responsibilities.
The speaker describes a redaction tool that redacts specific details from documents, which is one of the central use cases of the privacy aspect of the setup.
The speaker describes building model routing to understand which models to pick for different tasks based on evals and costs, with all models being open-source on their own GPU.
The speaker recommends using a self-hosted VPC or private cloud to preprocess sensitive documents instead of pasting everything into a cloud coding agent.
The speaker describes that preprocessing documents through the OCR tool-calling pipeline yields token savings, better context management, and a redacted output file.
The 100-cal or 50-cal air bike test is a great benchmark for field-sport conditioning. Around three minutes for 100 calories is good depending on the sport; around a minute for 50 calories means you're exceptionally well conditioned. Nobody reaches the three-minute mark on 100 calories without putting time into their conditioning — you can't fake it. Benchmarks differ by sport: a front-row rugby player won't have the same conditioning profile as a jiu-jitsu or judo athlete.
Choose sources → to get a library of your own and a daily brief.