35,595 results · Most relevant
Charlie Holtz argues that agents locked to your laptop are not nearly as effective as free-roaming agents that can act from anywhere. He is excited about building on top of free-range agents and recommends giving agents APIs to spawn themselves so they can kick off work from anywhere, such as phone, Telegram, or Slack.
Masaba Gupta advises that in a time of over-information and too much product, you have to protect your aesthetic even more. She says she has never been more protective of her work and signature style than now, and that when a brand grows larger and you feel out of control, that is exactly the time to come together and go back to your core.
AI actually knows very little — 99.9999% it doesn't know — and the questions you ask can change everything about the result, so understanding what is not already written in the brief or captured in the data matters before prompting.
Kevin Hou describes the Antigravity team's choice to skip heavy infrastructure and mechanical UIs in favor of sidecars and generative UI, creating a product experience 'not fixed in plastic', and frames heavy infrastructure and mechanical fixed UIs as preventing products from scaling with smarter models.
Roland Gavrilescu endorses that recipes should be owned by you but managed by your agents — treating the owner as the higher-taste personality in the room, with agents calibrating themselves to the taste of the maker. He says this is how products should really be built going forward.
Roland Gavrilescu describes 'looping around' as generating artifacts at the end of the first loop to then run a second loop on, enabling continuous improvement.
Roland Gavrilescu argues that the recipe — the full set of components for building self-improving agent systems — should be treated as the product, assembled into a Git repo as an ongoing strategy, and applied to AI systems the same way data recipes were applied to RL.
Roland Gavrilescu argues recipes should encode the taste of the maker into how agents are built — including how and why the maker arrived at a particular recipe — and that using someone else's recipe should bring that maker's taste and reasoning, not just the harness and model. He extends this to making one's taste portable enough that anyone can download it and become a one-to-one replica.
Roland Gavrilescu endorses that recipes should encode the taste of the makers into how you build agents, and that if you use someone else's recipe, you should be able to bring that taste too — it's not just the harness or the model, it's how you arrived at the recipe and why.
Roman Ugarte argues the right way to think about GrokBot is as a team of agents that do work for you, not an AI chat. These are long-lived agents, not one-off sessions, and they get smarter over time. He says to break out of the 'AI chat with connections' frame and instead see it as a colleague with a computer, where anything you would ask a colleague to do on a computer you can ask the bot to do. He also recommends thinking about building AI teammates from the perspective of building useful AI teammates rather than from a SaaS product perspective, and warns against assuming a simple product is not a work product or power tool, calling that baggage from bad B2B software.
hedged
Roman Ugarte's core heuristic: if you give models the right tools and the right infrastructure, they can do a lot. He extends this by saying that giving a bot access to the tools you use to do your job gets it a lot of the way there, and that much of what people perceive as AI being dumb or unimpactful is downstream of it being harnessed in the wrong way. He suggests giving the bot access to a much larger set of things plus its own computer to see how far it can go.
hedged
Erina Karati's central takeaway: improving long-running multi-agent systems requires running controlled experiments on the system itself rather than manually tuning prompts or trusting a single demo. The real question is whether, across controlled runs, the system behaves better.
hedged
When a model's forecast lands close to the actual result, verify the reasons are correct, not just the number. Two wrong assumptions can cancel out and produce a right answer for wrong reasons; a correct answer from compensating errors is luck, not skill, and is not a validated model.
If tables are not processed properly and diagrams are not parsed properly, information is lost during document ingestion.
Jesse Hall argues that voice agent components should be scored together as a stack rather than individually, because you ship a conversation, not components. The right model is the one that gets the answer for you the quickest, even if it is not at the top of a leaderboard.
Jesse Hall argues that when a voice agent's backend is processing, the agent should not go silent like a system; it should behave like a human would, using the time to continue the conversation. A human would not just go silent while the system is doing something.
Jesse Hall frames the goal of voice agent building as making the agent as human-like as possible, with latency as a constraint rather than the objective. The right question is how human-like an agent can fit within the latency window, not simply how fast the pipeline can go.
Jesse Hall presents turn detection — the agent knowing when to speak, when to keep listening, and when to stop talking — as a key piece of making voice agents feel human-like. Well-tuned turn detection lets the agent handle interruptions without falling apart.
Because every model call is small, typed, and checked against a schema, pointing it at a privately hosted model is a configuration change, not a rewrite — one line changes and the same answer comes back. Because every call has that same small typed shape, the same private-hosting change applies to almost all of them, making about 95% local inference viable as an architectural consequence, not a policy promise. Compliance risk goes down as an engineering roadmap, release by release.
Inject intelligence only where runtime judgment is genuinely required, and minimize reliance on LLMs everywhere else. In a regulated industry, token maxing (burning more tokens) is the wrong goal. The intelligent way to build is to use intelligence minimally and on purpose.
Choose sources → to get a library of your own and a daily brief.